Jump to content

Email Parser


dpbklyn
 Share

Recommended Posts

It would be awesome if the email parser went a little deeper.  Sometimes a client emails us directly and we forward that email to Pulseway to open a ticket.  The problem with this is that it opens the ticket using our company as the client. 

It would be great if we could get the parser to look in the email headers to find the address that the email originated from and use THAT to assign and client and user to the ticket.  There are other ticket systems that do this.

 

Alternatively (though not as elegant), It would also work to put a flag in the subject line like "@CLIENTNAME" to get the email assigned to the client.  Is there a way to do this with workflows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Chris,

I think you are misunderstanding the issue. example Customer sends an email to my work email (not support@ account, an account that doesn't go through Pulseway email parser) saying they have an issue. I then forward the email to my support@ account which goes through the Pulseway email parser. Now the ticket says it came from my company. This issue is common for us also. Mainly when we are out in the field and we forward the email to create a ticket so another available tech can work it.  

Edited by UTS-Mike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff

Hi,

I'm not sure if it is a good idea to search for the email address from which this email was originated in to the email. It is match simpler to ask your customers to send emails to the help-desk in a first place and then manage them from there, because that is the whole purpose for this application. And then into the Pulseway PSA you have the option to create workflows which will assign tickets to correct queues and notify the technicians that the new ticket was created. Also, multiple technicians can work on the same queue and once they start to work on the ticket, then technician can assign that ticket to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris, that would be nice if customers only sent to support@ for example but most of us know that in reality customers send to our own personal email addresses.

My current ticketing system allows me to send the original email, using Forward as an attachment, and the ticket is allocated correctly. Some ticketing systems will check the original emails even if forwarded and allocate to the correct customer.

Pulseway PSA needs to address this in one form or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff

Hi @Andy Raybould,

Have you tried to add multiple email parsers to your PSA instance (add your personnel email address so email parser can Pars emails from it)? You may try to create the separate folder in your inbox for these support request emails and then once you place an unread email in this folder, then IMAP will read this email and create a  ticket from it.

Please let us know how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have resolved this is kind of a kludgy way...I have created an email rule that look for a particular code in the subject line of the email so if I put !CLIENT it will assign that ticket to a particular client.  it will not assign it to a particular user, but this is better than nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2019 at 3:39 PM, dpbklyn said:

I have resolved this is kind of a kludgy way...I have created an email rule that look for a particular code in the subject line of the email so if I put !CLIENT it will assign that ticket to a particular client.  it will not assign it to a particular user, but this is better than nothing.

Can you share how you set up this rule? I'm sure it will help a lot of people like us facing the same issue.

From the responses above I really think Pulseway simply does not understand the issue and how common it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I know that this is an old thread, but the following workaround has worked for me in the past (with another PSA)...

Assuming that the support email box is an Exchange (or at least IMAP) mailbox, you can add that mailbox to the same email client as your direct email box.  When a user emails the support request to your direct inbox, you can simply copy or move the message into the support inbox (or what ever folder you designated in the PSA to scan/parse).  The email parser will "see" the email as if the client sent it to support@ and then create a ticket accordingly (it should then assign it to the correct client and user by parsing the from info).  Then you can "work" the ticket within the PSA.  When they start seeing replies from the PSA when you update the ticket (from support@), that might encourage then to start sending to support@ instead for future requests.

The act of physically copying the email message into the support inbox takes the same or less steps than your forwarding solution that didn't work as intended...

Hopefully this works for you.

If you don't like the idea of adding the support@ mailbox to your email client, the idea from Chris to add a new parser and have it scan a separate IMAP subfolder in YOUR inbox seems very feasable too.  You can then move the message from your inbox to this subfolder for the parser to scan...

Edited by Kyle
Added more context/info.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By Jamie Taylor
      Search, filter and quickly find network devices with the new Device List.    
    • By Jamie Taylor
      You can now view asset info and installed applications for offline Windows systems showing the last known information.

       
       

    • By john.overton
      Hello,
      I need the ability to set up ticket templates that only a few members of my organisation can access.
      For example a "New Starter" or "Leaver" template pre-populates loads of info, saving time for my admin team, but if I give everyone in the organisation access to these templates they will do what people do and attempt to circumvent the admin team.
      Is this something we can see in the near future? Seems like a simple enough thing to implement. You already have a couple "share with..." options on the template creator menu, perhaps we just expand on this a bit?
      Thanks
    • By Mark G38
      Let me start off by saying this is not meant with any kind of hate or ill will.  I very much love the Pulseway product overall, and I have been using it for a quite a number of years now.  I very much want to see Pulseway continue to improve and catch up to a lot of the other RMMs out there by addressing some obvious "misses" with certain aspects of the software.  This is going to be a bit of a novel but I hope the Pulseway staff and the community give it a read and feel free to comment, add suggestions, etc.  The below items are too much to put into a bunch of separate feature requests. I apologize in advance if this is too much in one spot  
       
      Interface/Web UI:
      Ability to completely remove or hide default scripts. Should also be able to delete individual ones within the default section. Ability to adjust script level permissions. There are some scripts I have written such as an MDM remote wipe type script that I want to be able to access within Pulseway if needed, or one of my higher tiered consultants but not my lower tier. I should be able to assign some sort of permissions to scripts to hide/show them based on security group, level, or team. A full inventory of the machine should be performed by the agent and visible in the web portal. This is a basic function of every other RMM I've used. I should be able to see all services on the machine, just like Pulseway looks at all applications installed. Services should then be selectable to be managed or not, or allow the ability to manage them right from that screen. Windows Updates - We should be able to easily see a list of installed updates on the machine without having to go back through Patch Policy History. The list could easily be populated on the Windows Updates section that Pulseway currently has. Dashboard - Needs more adjustable widgets. Patch status should be available as a dashboard widget with the ability to drill down to site/customer or filter for those things when creating the widget. PowerShell Console - Should be able to press up or some other key to be able to access, select previous inputs from that active session. Scopes - From the Scopes creation page, we should be able to then click on the Scope and see all the machines that the Scope includes.  This would be a much easier and faster way then having to go to Systems and then select the Scope and drill down that way.   Exclusions - We are unable to create exclusions for alerts.  The answer is to move the machine to it's own group, and apply a new policy to that machine.  This is certainly not ideal as 1, if you logically group your machines together, then splitting one out is a mess and even more importantly, then more policies created, the more you have to worry about going in and updating them when you want to change 1 thing. The less policies that have to be maintained, the better.
      Scripting:
      Input Variables - My single biggest issue with scripting currently is the lack of usability with the current custom input fields. It takes more time to click add/edit and input what is needed into the UI, then it does for me to just declare the same variables at the start of my script when writing them.
      Have script input variables work as environment variables, and they can be filled in at the time of script run. So if I have script to search for something by date range, I can create 2 input variables, Start & End, and leave them blank. When I got to run the script, it pops up a window with the available custom input variables allowing me to fill them in at that time. Here is an example of a popup window at the time of run for another RMM tool I've used. All these variables are declared in the script as $env:customvariablename, and then inside the RMM portal, at the script creation screen, they are entered in, much like you can with Pulseway, and you can select the type of variable. Variable value, Boolean, selection (dropdown). Whatever is selected/inputted at the time of ran is simply passed to the $env:customvariablename that corresponds to that input variable. I've shown the 3 areas of how this works to show the complete idea behind this in the attachments. Site Variables - Pretty much the same concept as above, except these are created at the site (customer) level instead of the script level. They are called in the same fashion as above. This would allow for much greater flexibly around scripting as many clients have license specific software that needs to be installed and being able to set a site(customer) level variable that gets pulled automatically when the script runs, would allow for 1 script to be made and ran across multiple clients at a time without having to edit the script or make copies with the unique license key for each. It would simply read from the site variable when running and insert whatever is in that site variable field. Output of scripts (the content) in the push notification or email alert. If I schedule a task to run on a recurring basis and I get a failure notification, being able to see why is incredible helpful. Or, even if it's a success, there are plenty of use cases why seeing the output is needed. If I'm running a script to collect xyz info across multiple systems, being able to easily see that in a central spot on the notification or email is imperative. I shouldn't have to log into Pulseway and check each machine or check the task and look through the report. Tasks - We should have the ability to schedule tasks to run much more frequently that once per day.   I would like the ability to run a custom script that checks for something specific let's say, once an hour, which then writes to a custom event log that I then have Pulseway set up to trigger an alert from.  This would be helpful in creating plenty of custom alerts based on Event Log errors but once a day is not frequent enough in some cases.  The ability to select multiple machines and run a script against them on the fly without having to tag them or create a scope and run a task.  When a task is completed and you are viewing the results, it would be awesome if you could click the machine and go right to it from there.  It's a little cumbersome to be viewing the results of a task, specifically looking at ones that failed, and then having to click out of the report and go drill down to each failed machine.   Workflows
      As I understand it, the entire workflow idea works around something that generates a notification. This creates a big issue with workflows in the sense that, we are limited to whatever Pulseway deems an acceptable "condition" or filter. What would make workflows amazing, would be essentially turning them into "custom monitors". What I mean by that is I create a script that let's say reads some random programs event log because my customer needs to know when this particular software generates a specific error, (and no, it doesn't write this error to any event log). There is no built in way to approach this with Pulseway. If I could simply create a workflow and choose to run a script as the initial item, and then based on the exit code of that script, do other things from run a script to fix, generate an alert to my team so someone can go in and look at what is causing the error and resolve it, etc. I could apply that workflow to any systems I wanted, and set it to run every 10 minutes, an hour, whatever, and when it detects the event, again, based on how the script was written, it triggers the workflow or the alert. As in the example above, if I set it to run every 30 minutes and look for "if error exists", if it does, it then creates an alert so that myself and my team get notified. But it would also allow the workflow to perform additional steps as remediation if desired.
      Another useful example of what I'm trying to explain, is perhaps I want to perform a certain set of steps based on a tag setup in Pulseway. I should be able to set up a workflow against a tag or against a scope and set it to run every so often. When a machine is then given that "tag" the workflow triggers and performs the steps assigned.
      This goes along with 4 under scripting.  In the same vein, workflows should be triggerable off the result of a script. In other words, I shouldn't HAVE to make it an event log entry. It would be great if I could set up a script via a task, and then set a workflow to check results of that script and allow me to choose either to alert or trigger a workflow on either a success of failure, whichever I wanted at that time.
      Cloud Backup:
      I would LOVE to use Pulseway's built in cloud backup, but there are just too many flaws / missing items in it currently.
      Scheduling - The only current options are every day, every 2, or every 3 days. All backup solutions I've ever seen, give you the ability to select which day(s) you want the backup to run, be it every Monday, or any multiple combination of days. We should also have the ability to select the TIME the backup will take place. Right now, it uses the time the backup job was created, so if I want a job to happen at 2 AM, I have to stay up until 2 AM to schedule that job for the first time. This is a very shocking miss on the backup front.
      Ability to exclude certain file types (by extension) is needed.
      Notification on job success or job failure is a MUST, not how it current is where it notifies you once it reaches below a targeted % range.
      The ability to see the used space. Since your cloud backup works off either 500GB or 1TB licenses, we need to be able to see how much space is current in use per machine so we can plan to take the needed action should the backups start approaching the limit.
      A report on the files backed up. Since this is a file only backup type, it's imperative to be able to see a list of all files backed up during the job, and if they were successful, failed, or skipped.
      The ability to specify if the backup is considered a failure based on % of failed or skipped files is also needed. For example, if I'm targeting 1000 files, perhaps 5 failed isn't a concern to me, but if 300 fail, that's a failed backup job IMO. Therefore, having the ability to say if 10% (or whatever amount I want) of files fail to backup, the job is considered failed. In general, during my demo of this, I've had some concerns which your staff did witness directly:
      The next backup date seems to fluctuate between the current day and next day if you sit that the backup status screen of Pulseway. The initial dig into a backup job, showed folders that I had excluded, were still present and you could drill down. However, after mounting a recovery to explore, the interface then hid all the folders not backed up. Concerning if it's collecting any data from folders I specifically didn't include in the target paths. You can see from the image below, it backed up 2 days in a row, almost the exact same amount of files and used the same amount of space. This is a test VM which had no changes in the test target directories, and yet the 2nd day it did what appears to be a full backup again. Subsequent days seem to have improved and the file count went down to a more expected level.  
      Here are some feature requests I submitted around some of the points above:
      https://pulseway.featureupvote.com/suggestions/189283/more-robust-input-and-site-variables
      https://pulseway.featureupvote.com/suggestions/189917/patch-status-dashboard-widget
      https://pulseway.featureupvote.com/suggestions/214566/more-flexible-task-scheduling
      https://pulseway.featureupvote.com/suggestions/217128/exclusions
      https://pulseway.featureupvote.com/suggestions/202867/attach-files-to-scripts
      https://pulseway.featureupvote.com/suggestions/202092/monitor-services-through-portal
      https://pulseway.featureupvote.com/suggestions/203512/system-type-as-workflow-condition




    • By Jamie Taylor
      Continuing our commitment to providing a secure environment, accounts with access to critical areas such as editing scripts and distributing custom titles, are now required to enable two factor authentication.

×
×
  • Create New...